Veranstaltungen

Vergangene Veranstaltungen

 

SVRSP ROUSSEAU LECTURES

Prof. John Mikhail (Georgetown University, Washington D.C.)

"The Sense of Justice, Private Interest, and Public Duty in the Age of Trump"

15. - 17. November 2017, Universität Zürich

 

Podcasts der Veranstaltung:

Lecture I - Rawls, Rousseau, and the Sense of Justice - 15.11.2017

Lecture II - The Sense of Justice in the Age of Trump - 16.11.2017

Impressionen:

Bildergalerie

Berichterstattung:

UZH News: Die Idee der Gerechtigkeit im Zeitalter von Trump

ZS: Rousseau in Zürich

Programm:  (PDF, 545 KB)

SVRSP Rousseau Lectures 2017, Broschüre (PDF, 545 KB)

 

Die Schweizerische Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie möchte mit den SVRSP Rousseau Lectures einen Beitrag zur gesellschaftlichen Verständigung über Grundfragen von Recht, Staat, internationaler Ordnung und Gerechtigkeit leisten. In Zeiten weitgehender politischer Verwerfungen in demokratischen Verfassungsstaaten und einer tiefen Krise der internationalen Rechts- und Friedensordnung ist es wichtig, sich der Grundlagen von Rechtsordnungen zu vergewissern, um sie gegen offene Feinde oder Gleichgültigkeit verteidigen zu können.

Prof. John Mikhail (Georgetown University, Washington D.C.) ist in einer zweiteiligen Gastvorlesung zum Thema «The Sense of Justice, Private Interest, and Public Duty in the Age of Trump» auf solche fundamentalen Fragen eingegangen und hat diese in der Gegenwartsdiskussion der Rechtsphilosophie eingegangen. Die Vorlesungen haben ideengeschichtliche Akzente gesetzt und gleichzeitig substantielle Fragen der Gegenwart aufgegriffen.

Mit Beiträgen von:
Prof. Dr. Monika Betzler, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Prof. Dr. Francis Cheneval, Universität Zürich
Dr. Dr. h.c. Gret Haller, alt Nationalrätin und Publizistin
Dr. Anne Kühler, Universität Zürich
Prof. Dr. Lutz Wingert, ETH Zürich
Prof. Dr. Simone Zurbuchen Pittlik, Universität Lausanne

Unterstützt von: Rechtswissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Zürich, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds, Mme Marie Gretler Stiftung, Temperatio Stiftung, ZUNIV, Socrethics Stiftung

Bei der Veranstaltung handelte es sich um die Premiere der SVRSP Rousseau Lectures, welche zukünftig alle zwei Jahre an verschiedenen schweizerischen Universitäten stattfinden werden. Die nächste Durchführung ist 2019 an den Universitäten Genf und Lausanne geplant.

Die Vorlesung war ebenfalls Teil der Langen Nacht der Philosophie am 16. November 2017: http://www.langenachtderphilosophie.ch/

 
Gastvortrag von Prof. Stephen J. Morse

Law & Neuroscience: Hope or Hype?

Bild_Gastvortrag

The discovery of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which permits non-invasive imaging of brain function, was an immense scientific breakthrough that seemed to create the possibility of previously unimaginable understanding of the relation between brain function, mind and behavior. Legal academics and lawyers, especially within criminal law, were quick to embrace this new technology. Some thought new discoveries might cause profound changes in legal doctrine and practice and perhaps even revolutionary reforms. This talk addresses the current state of law and neuroscience and suggests that legal changes based on neuroscience have been few to date and that contributions for the foreseeable future will be modest.

Gastvortrag Plakat (PDF, 510 KB)

Donnerstag, 2. März 2017, 18 Uhr

Hörsaal KOL-F-121, Hauptgebäude, Universität Zürich

Doktorandenkolloquium

Am 26. und 27. Januar 2017 fand im Hörsaal KO2-F-152 ein Kolloquium statt, an dem Assistierende und Doktorierende der Lehrstühle von Herrn Prof. Dr. Matthias Mahlmann, Herrn Prof. Dr. Lutz Wingert und Herrn Prof. Dr. Klaus Günther laufende Projekte vorstellten und diskutierten.

Programm Kolloquium (PDF, 159 KB)

Guest Lecture by Prof. Dr. J. Christopher McCrudden, 18.11.2015: "Human Rights Histories: Genesis, Validity and Ideology"

The history of human rights is a rapidly expanding scholarly discipline. One of the central academic debates among historians of human rights is to seek to ac-count for the origin and spread of human rights. Central questions are: How far does current human rights practice demonstrate continuity or radical discontinu-ity with previous attempts to secure rights? Is the history of human rights of foundational importance for their legitimacy? Are human rights nothing but a recent piece of normative ideology, destined to fade away in a future beyond rights?

Flyer (PDF, 193 KB)

Room RAI-H-041, 6 pm

Lecture Series "Constitutional Reform and Social Change in Asia and the Middle East: Law, Politics and Theory"

Constitutional reforms are being discussed and/or implemented in different regional contexts today. These endeavors develop in a context of increased transnationalization of norms and orders. Yet, they also vary from one region to the other. Furthermore, while debates on constitutional reform do not always lead to concrete changes of the Constitution they can evoke the emergence of new constitutional interpretations and lead to the transformation of norms. This lecture series aims therefore at inviting experts in the field of constitutional reform to present constitutional debates in different regional settings (namely Japan, India and the Middle East) and to analyze ensuing political transformations, normative changes and emerging new discursive patterns.

For more information, please see the Website of the URPP Asia and Europe Websiteand the preview in the "UZH news"-section.

Flyer (PDF, 620 KB)

Prof. Dr. Chibli Mallat, University of Utah / Saint-Joseph University, Lebanon, 17.03.2015: "2011 and the Middle East Challenge to World Constitutionalism"

In the lecture, Professor Chibli Mallat presents the most challenging themes to constitutionalism in the aftermath of the Arab Spring. He will discuss in particular: religion in the constitution, the sectarian conundrum, civil society and the state, and the (Swiss) model of rotating executive. These themes are examined extensively in his new book, Philosophy of Nonviolence: Revolution, Constitutionalism, and Justice beyond the Middle East, Oxford University Press 2015.

KOL-F-117, 18.15 - 20.00

Podcast

Prof. Dr. Hiroshi Nishihara, Waseda University, 28.04.2015: "Zwischen anspruchsvollen Erwartungen vom Staat und Repräsentationsdefizite: Warum akzeptieren viele Japaner den LDP-Entwurf der anti-freiheitlichen Verfassungsrevision"

Since about the start of this millennium, the political movement in Japan has been enlivened by efforts to revise its democratic Constitution, striving towards an emperor led totalitarian military State. The Japanese population that enjoyed its freedom and peace during the second half of the 20th century, does not show much reluctance to the new supporters of restoration. In order to better explain this contradictory phenomenon, I will analyze the peculiar mode of reception of democracy by the post-war Japanese and its current consequences.

KOL-F-117, 18.15 - 20.00

Prof. Dr. Arun Thiruvengadam, National University of Singapore, 07.05.2015: "Assessing the Social Rights Jurisprudence of India: Perspectives from Constitutional Theory and Comparative Law"

In recent years, there has been considerable debate in the field of comparative constitutional law on the issue of social rights and their enforcement by the judiciary in particular. This talk will engage with these debates by focusing on the record and experience of the Indian judiciary in enforcing the social rights provisions of its Constitution. The Constitution of India contains several provisions relating to social rights, many of which are housed in a part of the text that is expressly stated to be 'non-justiciable.' Over time, however, the Indian judiciary has, through a process of creative interpretation, mandated that the executive and legislature take proactive steps towards the implementation of these rights provisions. The talk will focus on this process, which has been the subject of considerable controversy but has, over time, gained the qualified support of progressive communities in India. The talk will focus on cases from the early 1980s through to more recent cases in the new century, and will also cover the scholarly literature in India and abroad that has developed around these issues. Finally, the talk will seek to draw contrasts and comparisons with the approach to social rights taken by judiciaries in South Africa and Colombia in particular.

KOL-F-117, 18.15 - 20.00

Podcast